«الفُرقة فرقتان: فرقة بالموت، وفرقة في الحياة، وقد تعدّ الثانية أصعب من الأولى؛ لأنها في مظنة التلاقي والمعالجة. صبّرنا اللَّه على مَا ينوب، وجعلنا ممن ينيب إليه ويتوب، ورحم الذي درج، ويسر الإياب للذي خرج».
أبو القاسم الرافعي (ت٦٢٣) بعد موت أخ له وخروج الآخر عن البلد
«الفُرقة فرقتان: فرقة بالموت، وفرقة في الحياة، وقد تعدّ الثانية أصعب من الأولى؛ لأنها في مظنة التلاقي والمعالجة. صبّرنا اللَّه على مَا ينوب، وجعلنا ممن ينيب إليه ويتوب، ورحم الذي درج، ويسر الإياب للذي خرج».
أبو القاسم الرافعي (ت٦٢٣) بعد موت أخ له وخروج الآخر عن البلد
BY عبدالله الوهيبي
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." As the war in Ukraine rages, the messaging app Telegram has emerged as the go-to place for unfiltered live war updates for both Ukrainian refugees and increasingly isolated Russians alike. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from us
