Госдума во вторник приняла в первом чтении законопроекты об административной и уголовной ответственности за утечки персональных данных
Поправки в законодательство, в частности, предполагают, что если утечка коснется от 1 тыс. до 10 тыс. субъектов, то штраф для юрлиц составит от 3 до 5 млн руб.; от 10 тыс. до 100 тыс. субъектов - от 5 до 10 млн рублей; более 100 тыс. - от 10 до 15 млн руб.
За повторные утечки предлагаются оборотные штрафы - для граждан в размере от 400 тыс. до 600 тыс. руб., для должностных лиц - от 2 млн до 4 млн руб., в отношении юридических лиц предусматривается оборотный штраф - от 0,1% до 3% выручки за календарный год или за часть текущего года, не менее 15 млн рублей и не более 500 млн рублей.
Госдума во вторник приняла в первом чтении законопроекты об административной и уголовной ответственности за утечки персональных данных
Поправки в законодательство, в частности, предполагают, что если утечка коснется от 1 тыс. до 10 тыс. субъектов, то штраф для юрлиц составит от 3 до 5 млн руб.; от 10 тыс. до 100 тыс. субъектов - от 5 до 10 млн рублей; более 100 тыс. - от 10 до 15 млн руб.
За повторные утечки предлагаются оборотные штрафы - для граждан в размере от 400 тыс. до 600 тыс. руб., для должностных лиц - от 2 млн до 4 млн руб., в отношении юридических лиц предусматривается оборотный штраф - от 0,1% до 3% выручки за календарный год или за часть текущего года, не менее 15 млн рублей и не более 500 млн рублей.
BY Раньше всех. Ну почти.
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital.
from us
