Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Canada’s immigration problems started almost immediately after we moved away from British and French exclusivity.

- 1900s - Indian nationalists illegally emigrate to and infiltrate Canada to siphon wealth and resources for terrorist activities, assassinate immigration inspector William Hopkinson on the steps of a Vancouver courthouse.

1920s – Radical political movements like the Communist Party of Canada drew disproportionately from Eastern European and Ashkenazi communities, alarming officials.

1946 – Two thirds of Canadians told Gallup they opposed immigration from Europe, and a majority wanted Asians and Jews excluded.

1947 – Prime Minister Mackenzie King stated plainly that “Canada is perfectly within her rights in selecting the persons whom we regard as desirable future citizens” and that no one had a “fundamental right” to enter. He promised immigration would remain cautious, explicitly affirming Anglo-French priority.

1952 – More than half of Canadians told Gallup the country did not need immigrants.

1955 – Nearly sixty percent supported keeping Canada’s discriminatory policies in place.

1956 – Immigration minister Jack Pickersgill admitted reforms had to be introduced quietly because the public opposed them.

Late 1950s – Officials continued using selective programs (e.g. for domestic workers, agricultural labourers, displaced persons) rather than open announcements, precisely to avoid a public backlash.

1960 – Almost seventy percent of Canadians disapproved of increasing immigration.

1961 – A majority still wanted to restrict non-white entry.

Early 1960s – The Department of Citizenship and Immigration deliberately downplayed its policy changes in public communications. The new regulations of 1962, which ended explicit racial discrimination, were implemented without fanfare.

1960s – Even Diefenbaker’s and Pearson’s governments avoided public campaigns about their reforms; officials described their approach as “gradual” and “quiet,” ensuring that policy shifted before the public had a chance to react.

- 1965 - Lester B. Pearson elected, Canadian Red Ensign forcibly changed to the maple leaf flag

1967 – The points system was introduced without broad consultation or debate, framed in bureaucratic technical language rather than political argument, which minimized scrutiny.

1971 – Nearly eighty percent of Canadians opposed immigration, yet Pierre Trudeau declared multiculturalism official policy. It was presented as a cultural program more than a demographic one, softening the impression of change while entrenching it at the state level.

- 1988 - Canadian Multiculturalism Act passed by conservative Brian Mulroney.

- 2006 - Stephen Harper floods Canada with 3 million immigrants, mostly from China, India and the Phillipines

- 2015 - Justin Trudeau elected, continues his father’s policies for a decade, population jumps from 37 to 43 million by 2025.
💯27🤬93🤣1



group-telegram.com/fortissaxistyping/8141
Create:
Last Update:

Canada’s immigration problems started almost immediately after we moved away from British and French exclusivity.

- 1900s - Indian nationalists illegally emigrate to and infiltrate Canada to siphon wealth and resources for terrorist activities, assassinate immigration inspector William Hopkinson on the steps of a Vancouver courthouse.

1920s – Radical political movements like the Communist Party of Canada drew disproportionately from Eastern European and Ashkenazi communities, alarming officials.

1946 – Two thirds of Canadians told Gallup they opposed immigration from Europe, and a majority wanted Asians and Jews excluded.

1947 – Prime Minister Mackenzie King stated plainly that “Canada is perfectly within her rights in selecting the persons whom we regard as desirable future citizens” and that no one had a “fundamental right” to enter. He promised immigration would remain cautious, explicitly affirming Anglo-French priority.

1952 – More than half of Canadians told Gallup the country did not need immigrants.

1955 – Nearly sixty percent supported keeping Canada’s discriminatory policies in place.

1956 – Immigration minister Jack Pickersgill admitted reforms had to be introduced quietly because the public opposed them.

Late 1950s – Officials continued using selective programs (e.g. for domestic workers, agricultural labourers, displaced persons) rather than open announcements, precisely to avoid a public backlash.

1960 – Almost seventy percent of Canadians disapproved of increasing immigration.

1961 – A majority still wanted to restrict non-white entry.

Early 1960s – The Department of Citizenship and Immigration deliberately downplayed its policy changes in public communications. The new regulations of 1962, which ended explicit racial discrimination, were implemented without fanfare.

1960s – Even Diefenbaker’s and Pearson’s governments avoided public campaigns about their reforms; officials described their approach as “gradual” and “quiet,” ensuring that policy shifted before the public had a chance to react.

- 1965 - Lester B. Pearson elected, Canadian Red Ensign forcibly changed to the maple leaf flag

1967 – The points system was introduced without broad consultation or debate, framed in bureaucratic technical language rather than political argument, which minimized scrutiny.

1971 – Nearly eighty percent of Canadians opposed immigration, yet Pierre Trudeau declared multiculturalism official policy. It was presented as a cultural program more than a demographic one, softening the impression of change while entrenching it at the state level.

- 1988 - Canadian Multiculturalism Act passed by conservative Brian Mulroney.

- 2006 - Stephen Harper floods Canada with 3 million immigrants, mostly from China, India and the Phillipines

- 2015 - Justin Trudeau elected, continues his father’s policies for a decade, population jumps from 37 to 43 million by 2025.

BY Fortissax is Typing 🍁⚜️


Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260

Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/fortissaxistyping/8141

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones.
from us


Telegram Fortissax is Typing 🍁⚜️
FROM American