В мене досить стійка огида до демонології(гів) всіх видів, скоріше за все це зумовлено тим, що в роки своєї юності я сам її активно практикував, іноді в самих жахливих чаклунських формах. Тому із досвіду знаю, чому це хуйня їбана. І за базар можу відповісти
В мене досить стійка огида до демонології(гів) всіх видів, скоріше за все це зумовлено тим, що в роки своєї юності я сам її активно практикував, іноді в самих жахливих чаклунських формах. Тому із досвіду знаю, чому це хуйня їбана. І за базар можу відповісти
BY Λαμπρινή
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news.
from id
