● В оценке рисков для экономики Лагард отметила, что торговое соглашение с США, прекращение огня на Ближнем Востоке и прогресс в отношениях между Китаем и США «смягчили риски замедления роста экономики».
● Однако Лагард также указала на сохраняющуюся волатильность торговой среды и ухудшение решений на финансовых рынках как на источники рисков.
● В оценке рисков для экономики Лагард отметила, что торговое соглашение с США, прекращение огня на Ближнем Востоке и прогресс в отношениях между Китаем и США «смягчили риски замедления роста экономики».
● Однако Лагард также указала на сохраняющуюся волатильность торговой среды и ухудшение решений на финансовых рынках как на источники рисков.
Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from in
