Фактически создаётся новый класс "лишенцев", как в 1920-е. Но теперь это ещё и бизнес-риски. И возможности конкурентной борьбы: достаточно пролоббировать (или просто написать донос) признание кого-то из состава конкурентов иноагентом - и пожалуйста, у конкурента налоги вырастают почти втрое
Фактически создаётся новый класс "лишенцев", как в 1920-е. Но теперь это ещё и бизнес-риски. И возможности конкурентной борьбы: достаточно пролоббировать (или просто написать донос) признание кого-то из состава конкурентов иноагентом - и пожалуйста, у конкурента налоги вырастают почти втрое
Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. 'Wild West'
from us
