В годовщину победы в Сталинградской битве. Видите огромные толпы пришедших праздновать россиян? И я не вижу. Потому что туда приехал "любимый народом" Путин. На всём Мамаевом кургане Путин будет один, сам курган оцеплен полками ФСО.
В годовщину победы в Сталинградской битве. Видите огромные толпы пришедших праздновать россиян? И я не вижу. Потому что туда приехал "любимый народом" Путин. На всём Мамаевом кургане Путин будет один, сам курган оцеплен полками ФСО.
Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK.
from us
