Я не удивлюсь, если инициативу Бубочки по запрету УПЦ с радостным визгом поддержат католики, униаты и жулье из секты "ПЦУ". Они надеются поляну освоить. Не особо удивлюсь и поддержке каких-нибудь муфтиев, - этим на терки кяфиров плевать. Но вот раввин зря бежит впереди паровоза. То есть, желание лизнуть первым тоже понятно, но уж кому-кому, а его пастве это когда-нибудь обязательно откликнется.
Я не удивлюсь, если инициативу Бубочки по запрету УПЦ с радостным визгом поддержат католики, униаты и жулье из секты "ПЦУ". Они надеются поляну освоить. Не особо удивлюсь и поддержке каких-нибудь муфтиев, - этим на терки кяфиров плевать. Но вот раввин зря бежит впереди паровоза. То есть, желание лизнуть первым тоже понятно, но уж кому-кому, а его пастве это когда-нибудь обязательно откликнется.
The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from us
