Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/resist_UAde/--): Failed to open stream: No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Resistance Connections UA 🇺🇦 | Telegram Webview: resist_UAde/2335 -
The political ideology of "Neo-Eurasianism", which has gained concrete political influence in Russia in recent years, not only employs narratives of an imperial future but also those concerning the origins of Eurasia and its conflicts.
The workshop discusses various perspectives on neo-Eurasianist historical narratives. It focuses on exploring the processes of historical construction in contemporary Russia and in countries, communities, and collectives often referred to as "post-Soviet":
- How do contemporary imperial ideologies in Russia interpret specific historical events?
- Which political myths are reproduced and retold?
- To what extent do Western-centered narratives ("The West against Russia/Eurasia") dominate, and to what extent are they deconstructed?
- How do narratives about origin and foundation contribute to knowledge production in imperial and colonial systems, and how are they related to political agendas?
The political ideology of "Neo-Eurasianism", which has gained concrete political influence in Russia in recent years, not only employs narratives of an imperial future but also those concerning the origins of Eurasia and its conflicts.
The workshop discusses various perspectives on neo-Eurasianist historical narratives. It focuses on exploring the processes of historical construction in contemporary Russia and in countries, communities, and collectives often referred to as "post-Soviet":
- How do contemporary imperial ideologies in Russia interpret specific historical events?
- Which political myths are reproduced and retold?
- To what extent do Western-centered narratives ("The West against Russia/Eurasia") dominate, and to what extent are they deconstructed?
- How do narratives about origin and foundation contribute to knowledge production in imperial and colonial systems, and how are they related to political agendas?
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. "Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels." Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups.
from us
