The Gospel was Preached to Shem, Ham and Japheth, in that Order by Arthur Custance

Continuing along the lines of my previous post, Custance notes the particular order Noah’s sons are listed in Scripture. With this in mind, he observes how God often operates according to that pattern. Regarding the gospel being preached to the nations Custance writes,

“The First Preaching of the Gospel. The Gospel was preached first to Shem, then to Ham, and finally to Japheth. Once again there is no doubt about the first and the last of the two branches to receive the Gospel. The message was first to ‘ye men of Israel’ (Acts 2:22) and subsequently to the Centurion Cornelius of the Italian Band, a Roman and a child of Japheth (Acts 10:34). Between these two we have that incident of Philip telling the Gospel to an Ethiopian who gladly heard the message and believed (Acts 8:35).”
-Noah’s Three Sons: Human History in Three Dimensions by Arthur C. Custance, page 22.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

All Three Races Played a Role in the Crucifixion of the Lord Jesus Christ by Arthur C. Custance

“Those Playing an Official Role in the Crucifixion. Each branch of the race took a specific part in the Crucifixion. The moral responsibility was accepted by Israel (Matt. 27: 25); the physical burden of carrying the Cross was placed upon a Cyrenian, a child of Ham (Luke 23:26); the responsibility for execution was assumed by Japheth, who in the soldiers completed the sentence which only the Roman authorities could perform (Matt. 27:26). As far as Semitic responsibility is concerned, the issue was clear. They said, ‘His blood be upon us and our children,’ though afterwards they sought to unburden themselves of this responsibility (Acts 5:28). It should be stated here that Japheth also shared in this moral responsibility, though it seems that Pilate would have released Jesus if he could have found a way to do it without endangering his own position. Washing his hands did not relieve him of the moral responsibility, yet there is a sense in which he did not have the same kind of moral responsibility as that borne by the Jewish authorities. They set the stage and engineered the course of events, and Pilate found himself trapped… An article appearing in His Magazine by Steven Trapnell dealing with Simeon of Cyrene makes the following observations... this Cyrenian who carried the Cross of Christ was a Negro, coming as he did from North Africa....Such an honour and privilege, initially granted to only one man, was given not to a Jew but to a Gentile; not to a Judean but to a Cyrenian; not to a white man but to a Negro… My own impression is that Scripture is designed to teach this important truth, that God has never lost sight of Shem, Ham, and Japheth, nor ceased to work out His purposes using certain unique qualities which can be shown have, by and large, characterized their descendants.”
-Noah’s Three Sons: Human History in Three Dimensions by Arthur C. Custance, pages 22-24.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

The Curse of Ham or the Curse of Canaan? by Arthur C. Custance

“It has always been a matter of controversy as to why Canaan rather than Ham should have been cursed. Canaan was Ham’s son, and was therefore grandson to Noah. Some people have supposed that the name Canaan was substituted for Ham by Jewish scribes who had particularly strong feelings against this branch of Ham’s family… There is another explanation which seems to me more probable, and which if it is true, means that Noah really was cursing Ham. It is a common social custom among many primitive people to attribute the greatness of a son to the father, who then receives the honor for having raised such a worthy child. This is clearly reflected in Scripture where Saul seeks to honor David after the slaying of Goliath. He asks his general whose son the lad is (I Sam. 17:55). This has always seemed to mean that he did not recognize David, which would seem very strange in view of David’s close associations with him. Undoubtedly Saul knew David well enough, but evidently he did not know who his father was. It was his father he was seeking to honor according to social custom. Also, a woman could not bless a worthy son’s father, but she could bless his mother thereby giving personal witness to his worthiness. This seems to be the background of the woman’s observation in Luke 11:27. A man in blessing his own son was in fact blessing himself. This was true when Noah blessed Shem and Japheth. By the same token, however, if he had cursed Ham, the real offender, he would at the same time have been cursing himself. Quite logically, he could only pass judgment upon Ham by cursing Ham’s own son, which is what he therefore did… In the case of Ham and his descendants history shows that they have rendered an extraordinary service to mankind.”
-Noah’s Three Sons: Human History in Three Dimensions by Arthur C. Custance, pages 25-26.

𝔹𝕠𝕦𝕟𝕕𝕤 𝕠𝕗 ℍ𝕒𝕓𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟

Interracial Marriages between Japhetian Loyola/Borgia bloodlines and Shemite Incaic Nobility

As I have noted in my two previous posts: The Jesuit Pioneers of Anti-Whiteism and The Founding Fathers of Race Denialism, the Jesuits favor the annihilation rather than the preservation of the three Biblical, Noahic races. To the end that the Pope of their making can unite the world under a one world government.

The above painting which hangs in the Pedro de Osma Museum and the Church of la Compañía de Jesús, depicts the Marriages of Martín García Óñez de Loyola (nephew of Ignatius Loyola) with the Inca princess Nũsta Beatriz Clara Coya and of Juan de Enríquez de Borja (grandson of Francis Borgia) with Ana María Lorenza de Loyola y Coya, the daughter of the previous couple. Thus the Jesuits were united with Incan nobility through marriages in successive generations. Between the couples are the two most important Jesuits Ignatius Loyola and Francis Borja. Above them is the Jesuit monogram.

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕

Kalergi was a race mixed Catholic, but nobody cares to mention that.

He’s literally us.

Bible verses that condemn interracial marriage.

Whether you agree or disagree with Kirk’s politics, to place him on the same level as Michael King is to minimize the wickedness and heresies of “MLK”

Catholic Church seems to be a major player in pushing refugees because they want more Catholic Latinos in America.

The folly of putting religion before race!

@MartinezPolitix

Uphold natural affection!

@Kinism

Italians are White