https://open.substack.com/pub/drmikeyeadon/p/my-friend-fiona

If you are not on board with Mike’s Substack please consider subscribing. All material is available for free

Tim

https://open.substack.com/pub/docmalik/p/395-fiona-diamond-mass-non-compliance

I’m hoping that everyone can listen to this for free, given the timeliness of this conversation between Doc Malik and Fiona Hine.

These two are fierce.

Mind you, Fiona’s mother sounds like a feisty lady. Christine, I hope I get to meet you one day.

Please uphold your resolve never to give in to the predations of these evil people and their relentless overreach. Shove back.

Best wishes
Mike

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-links-to-the-clear

I’ve fallen behind with email notifications due to travel & I’m not sure if I shared this good assembly of various pieces, many from me but often referencing others rather shocking revelations.

If you’ve already seen it and don’t need the reminder, scroll past.

Best wishes
Mike
Ps: good luck for today, everyone who is attending the London event!

I can’t personally warrant that this is all true but it fits with the fragmentary information I have gathered in recent years.
I do stand behind the dictum, “All wars are bankers’ wars”.

For your discerning consideration.

Best wishes
Mike

Big Banks Prepare for Compliance Based Currency

Greg Reece Report

https://www.group-telegram.com/australiaforfreedom

We finally obtained the transcript, in Dutch, of the oral hearing in front of the judge deciding whether or not to permit the independent experts to give evidence under oath & to face cross examination by counsel for the defence.
This is the case in which several injured people have claimed that they are victims of a deliberate campaign to deceive them and to induce them into taking unnecessary & dangerous injections.
The lawyers for the accused, with one exception, appear to have said nothing. We still don’t know who their independent experts will be.
Peter Stassen, for the injured parties, did most of the talking, rebutting the weak sauce reasoning that Bourla, Gates, Rutte et al make that I & the others must not be heard.
Further analysis of this transcript may come, most likely from Sasha, who is well versed in spotting inconsistencies of the objections to hearing from us.
Meanwhile, here is the translation of that transcript.
Best wishes
Mike

https://substack.com/@kazzawales/note/c-160798213

This open letter to her Member of Parliament is well worth reading. Without being overly conspiratorial, the author lays out ten points which inform her resolution never to cooperate with its imposition.

Below is point 1.

Please also find my post below the article.

Best wishes
Mike
—————————

Dear Becky
Open letter.
I am among your many constituents who have signed a petition to cease and desist from undemocratically imposing Digital ID (Britcard) on British Citizens.
1. My passport is my identity and is safe under lock and key. It won't disappear when the battery runs out on my phone or when the electricity goes down, or when signal is poor. The same goes for my driver's license. I proved my identity with my passport to get my National Insurance number when I was 18. In every job I have had, I have proven my identity with my passport, provided my proven National Insurance number. I proved my identity in person to the bank. The bank should not require any further identity and certainly not Digital Identity. The same goes for my driver's license. I totally reject any need for a paperless, easily hacked, digital identity.

The constituent hasn’t yet heard back from her MP. So she wrote a reminder open letter, this time referencing a reply another constituent elsewhere had already received from their MP.

Way to go!

Best wishes
Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/karinschroeder/p/the-official-mp-response-to-digital

https://mileswmathis.com/chase.pdf

I have come across what I immediately thought was a psyop probably two years ago. This idea is that “Your life is nothing but a simulation”.

I’ve seen this hinted at obliquely and sometimes explicitly several times. As an explanation for life’s complexity & wonder, I find it implausible. I can see how useful it could be to The Perpetrators, if they could persuade you that you’re nothing but a few lines of code, running on a computer that is the universe itself. After all, who would fight for Windows 108 Pro, even if you ran on it?

Anyone with a million subscribers on YouTube who is also pushed by the “authorised alternatives’, like Joe Rogan, isn’t your friend. Whatever he’s up to, he’s not your friend.

Why all this preamble? Well, I’d like to share an alleged history & backstory to The Tavistock Institute. I learned from Mike Williams, Mark Devlin, the guys at Sheep Farm podcasts and others that the most heavily promoted figures of U.K. & USA pop and rock have been used to socially engineer us for decades. I cannot warrant that all of the details in Chase Hughes video are correct nor that key information isn’t missing. With those caveats, if you feel like watching, here’s that video on Tavistock.

Best wishes
Mike

https://youtu.be/SRb1sbuCNWA

https://youtu.be/TiwADS600Jc

If this doesn’t persuade you NOT to use or at least not to RELY on AI systems, I don’t know what to say to you.

First, they lie. Not always. But you won’t know when. If BS is all you need, knock yourself out.

Second, and this is crucial, there simply isn’t the data out there on the basis of which these systems can even be trained.

Mixing music, for example. Listen to Rick Beato’s short description of how he know there isn’t the data.

I know it isn’t there in pharma drug discovery (not that I’d so proudly trumpet that these days). Senior management never knew it. We don’t fully understand it ourselves. A machine trained on such sparse data is going to underperform an evenly modestly accomplished semi expert.

But many of us are being conditioned to believe AI is going to take almost all jobs.

Not unless nobody cares that these tasks are done shoddily, possibly actually incorrectly.

We may be down on occasions but we are not out. We humans remain unique.

Best wishes
Mike

I’m sad to report a recent communication from

Martin Grogam - @Grogbowl - the founder of the reality of illness website -

to a subscriber to Mike’s chat group

Has confirmed that Martin is still promoting the scammer impostor that Mike has fought to get down for 4 years

A reminder that when admin here, Martin saw the havoc the impostor was wreaking : promoting false people and false pharmaceuticals. And also contacting members to try and sell them crypto.

He also saw Mike’s concerned posts about the scammer. Some way to treat your hero.

Although martin makes it clear, he knows it’s a copy site , he does not make it clear that he knows it does more than copy - although he has made this clear in the past.

Martin has been posting inflammatory posts about Mike’s popularity in order to poke supporters of Mike into voting in his weekly popularity poll.

Until Mike is represented properly my own personal view - for what it is worth - echoed by many in DMs - is that it is better not to give this scoundrel oxygen.

Thanks
Tim

https://suavek1.substack.com/p/dr-mike-yeadon-and-allen-the-lab

A particularly good collection of pieces, particularly from “Allen”. Perhaps the best, most terse description of the entire crime is in the comments.

Thanks as always to Suavek.

Best wishes
Mike

https://youtu.be/tAo8kO2CJNI

Unusually, this podcast, an interview with two people who claim to have deep knowledge of AI technologies (I’ve no reason to doubt that this is exactly what they are but, knowing nothing about them before this conversation with Jeremy Nell aka Jerm Warfare, I’m taking it on trust), this podcast contains several “Easter eggs”, unexpected things which are very important & positive ones, too.

I’ve long been a sceptic of AI, so much so that I won’t use it. I don’t trust its output & I trust it to tell me when it simply doesn’t know.

There is genuine reason to be optimistic that not only will AI NOT imminently destroy the vast majority of the jobs not already displaced by mechanical automation, but it’s NEVER going to be able to do this.

Bluntly, it doesn’t do what we’ve been programmed to think it does. These experts explain complicated concepts in ways that even I can understand.

I wonder if the tale they tell about “self driving cars” is correct? Does anyone here know?

I’m personally aware that “the training set” of information on the basis of which these systems “learn” is bunk, in some areas. Earlier today, I read an article in which one of the AI was being trained. I’d either never heard of the sources, or they were sources I reject, because I’ve tested them in areas I’m competent to judge.

On another aspect, I watched musicologist Rick Beato flay alive a number of AI models, also in a field about which he knows a lot (the art & science of mixing).

https://youtu.be/TiwADS600Jc

The assumed capabilities of AI is a Potemkin village. It’s yet another thing we’ve been lied to about.

“There’s nothing to fear except fear itself”, as a US president once said.

Best wishes
Mike

https://substack.com/@mealsnminutes/note/c-167952585

I couldn’t fail to pass on this tale of a seemingly random act of kindness. A passenger in first class gave up his seat so that a tired mother, bringing her sick child to a doctor, with all the equipment she was lugging around, could have a more comfortable flight.

Best wishes
Mike

https://youtu.be/9agNdLTJIOE

Why in the world would you grant your bank the ability, if they’re told to, to stop payments once you’ve reached some arbitrary & irrelevant threshold amount of CO2 in a given period?

Best wishes
Mike
Ps: the suggested AI interpretation is a bit of a giveaway.

https://youtu.be/5gRFciggFFs

I met a person in Nice today who is extremely wide awake. He’s an investigational journalist. The stories he told were hair raising, or at least, they would have been just six years ago.
He’s here to video me. More when I know it.

It occurred to me today, in that conversation, that we each have huge blind spots, arising from simply not having had certain things pointed out to us. He wasn’t familiar with fake nukes, though he’d pretty much deduced it from the absurdity of the recent provocations in Ukraine (which would never have been allowed to reach such a pitch in the past) and also from the revolution in Turkey in which, just a few years ago, the main airbase used by the US Air Force, allegedly equipped with many nukes, was overrun. The USA did absolutely nothing about it.

I touched on the Tavistock and though he had heard of it, he didn’t know the back story. He’s decades younger than me. I wondered if some here haven’t watched even an hour of Mark Devlin. All the claims are backed up with sources in his “Musical Truths” book series.

One thing we agreed on: continuously pricking the balloon of the horrific lying going on all around us is vital in beating the evil. It gives permission to others to others to do the same. They’re counting on us not doing this. Prove them wrong.

Best wishes
Mike

IMPORTANT. I will say, I read this from a different source a few days ago.
The authorities SO badly want & need us to sign up for this system, not the mark of the beast, but adjacent to & enabling of it (by which I mean permanent chip implantation) that they don’t even care that the system is known not to be sufficiently secure.
It’s literally failed legal validation on minimally required security standards used widely in settings where high security is absolutely necessary.

This is reckless and shows they’re not thinking properly any more.

Tell everyone you know. Warn them that’s it’s not even secure, but will down the road be linked to your bank accounts, your medical records and your personal confidential information.

Best wishes
Mike

"One Login... does not conform to the mandatory secure by design principles or align with the 39 requirements of the National Cyber Security Centre’s Cyber Assessment Framework"

"GDS.... still cannot guarantee that devices are locked down and cannot prevent unauthorised devices being used by contractors, who do the bulk of the work. Nor does Government have an IT team that specialises in building and maintaining these Paws"

As it's unable to lock down its kit, there’s no way it can meet security standards on that issue alone

One Login is a danger to your security. It will expose you to data breach, identity theft, and fraud. This alone is reason enough to refuse to use it. It's lawful excuse or the excuse of necessity

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2025/10/20/starmers-digital-id-dream-is-already-a-real-nightmare/