🚨🚨🚨در کوچه و خیابان ببینید از هر صد نفر: چند نفر ماسک ندارند؟ چند نفر ماسکشان روی چانه‌شان است؟ چندنفر ماسکشان زیر بینی‌شان است؟ چند نفرشان پایین ماسکشان درست زیر چانه تنظیم نشده؟ چند نفرشان ماسک فیلتردار زده‌اند؟ چند نفر ماسکشان طوری زده شده که از بغل صورتشان یا از کنار بینی‌شان مگس عبور می‌کند چه رسد به ویروس؟ و چند نفرشان گمان کرده‌اند چون ماسک دارند دیگر فاصله فیزیکی لازم نیست؟ کسانی هم که ماسکی با جنس ناکارآمد دارند که ممکن است به راحتی قابل تشخیص نباشد. این اشکالات کی باید رفع شوند؟ چه کسی باید این نکات را آموزش دهد؟ لطفاً این نکات را برای هرکس می‌توانید بفرستید: www.group-telegram.com/nouritazeh/4064
🚨🚨🚨در کوچه و خیابان ببینید از هر صد نفر: چند نفر ماسک ندارند؟ چند نفر ماسکشان روی چانه‌شان است؟ چندنفر ماسکشان زیر بینی‌شان است؟ چند نفرشان پایین ماسکشان درست زیر چانه تنظیم نشده؟ چند نفرشان ماسک فیلتردار زده‌اند؟ چند نفر ماسکشان طوری زده شده که از بغل صورتشان یا از کنار بینی‌شان مگس عبور می‌کند چه رسد به ویروس؟ و چند نفرشان گمان کرده‌اند چون ماسک دارند دیگر فاصله فیزیکی لازم نیست؟ کسانی هم که ماسکی با جنس ناکارآمد دارند که ممکن است به راحتی قابل تشخیص نباشد. این اشکالات کی باید رفع شوند؟ چه کسی باید این نکات را آموزش دهد؟ لطفاً این نکات را برای هرکس می‌توانید بفرستید: www.group-telegram.com/nouritazeh/4064
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Lastly, the web previews of t.me links have been given a new look, adding chat backgrounds and design elements from the fully-features Telegram Web client. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from us
