Telegram Group Search
Letter 28 - Reject the IHR amendments.docx
19.8 KB
Letter 28 – Reject the 2024 proposed amendments to the International Health Regulation 2005 (IHR)

You may remember the negotiations which took place at the WHO last year in relation to the International Health Regulations 2005 (IHR). The date for governments around the world to reject them is 19th July, 2025 otherwise they will be deemed to have been accepted. The UK government is no different and MPs need to understand this and have a chance to formally oppose the changes.

Write to your MP today using our template (attached). Personalising your letter is even better if you can. Let us know of the responses you receive at [email protected]

https://www.ukcitizen.org/write-to-your-mp-reject-the-2024-proposed-amendments-to-the-international-health-regulation-2005-ihr/
Forwarded from Big Brother Watch
Reject digital ID

Watch: https://youtube.com/shorts/QCDR_v6d72o

Keir Starmer is considering a mandatory digital ID called “BritCard”

It would make us all reliant on a digital pass to go about our daily lives, eroding our rights & freedoms

We're fighting against this proposal - join us!

Subscribe | @BigBrotherWatchHQ
👍242
Forwarded from Ian Jarvis
Home Affairs Committee, call for evidence.
https://committees.parliament.uk/work/9176/
We have until Thursday 21 August 2025 to comment on the introduction of a MANDATORY DIGITAL IDENTITY.
Although it's not called a "consultation" is is de facto. Thus it should be in line with the case law Gunning Principles. (GPs)
For those unfamiliar with GPs her is a link to a short presentation
https://youtu.be/sc3hX-EhXuo
👍7
Forwarded from StopNetZero.org
For the cost of Milibrain's Carbon Capture folly (£30bn) we could have 6 nuclear power stations delivered in 8 years, which don't need carbon capture and which would provide nearly all of our summertime demand for electricity at vastly lower cost.

Net Zero is a Cult and its high priest is Miliband.

A manmade CO2 Climate Crisis is the lie that is being used to tax away your wealth and regulate away your freedoms.

#StopNetZero

https://youtu.be/EgHbCqzQGkc?t=4557
👏11👍3
Forwarded from StopNetZero.org
StopNetZero.org
For the cost of Milibrain's Carbon Capture folly (£30bn) we could have 6 nuclear power stations delivered in 8 years, which don't need carbon capture and which would provide nearly all of our summertime demand for electricity at vastly lower cost. Net Zero…
Why not write to your MP?


Dear [MP’s Name],

Re: Urgent Concerns Regarding Ed Miliband’s £30 Billion Carbon Capture Plan

I am writing to express my serious concern about the actions of the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, Ed Miliband, and to urge you to challenge what I believe may amount to misfeasance or malfeasance in public office.

Mr Miliband’s proposal to spend £30 billion of taxpayers' money on carbon capture and storage (CCS) is deeply misguided. CCS is an unproven and unreliable technology, with a track record of failure and underperformance. A comprehensive 2022 report by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis found that “the majority of CCS projects have underperformed, failed outright, or simply never materialised.”

In contrast, a similar investment—£30 billion—could fund the construction of approximately six modern nuclear power stations. South Korea’s APR-1400 reactor model, successfully deployed in the United Arab Emirates, offers a compelling example of cost-effective nuclear development. The four Barakah reactors, with a total capacity of 5.6 GW, are expected to supply around 25% of the UAE’s electricity at a cost of approximately £18–20 billion—and crucially, were delivered close to schedule and budget.

France’s historical nuclear program also proves that a consistent, standardised rollout of nuclear infrastructure can deliver low-carbon energy at scale, affordably. By the 1990s, France was producing over 70% of its electricity from nuclear, thanks to efficient planning and strong political will.

Unlike CCS, nuclear power requires no speculative technology to sequester emissions. It produces consistent, reliable base-load electricity, and during summer months could cover the vast majority of the UK’s energy needs. Furthermore, nuclear assets are ideal for long-term institutional investors—including pension funds—because of their predictable, inflation-linked returns. By contrast, CCS, wind, and solar remain volatile, intermittent, and risk-laden from an investment perspective.

Given the overwhelming evidence against CCS as a viable large-scale solution, Mr Miliband’s decision to prioritise it over proven, cost-effective alternatives like nuclear is deeply troubling. I believe this course of action represents a negligent misuse of public funds, driven more by ideology than sound science or economics.

I urge you to raise this matter in Parliament, question the rationale behind this spending commitment, and push for a reassessment of our national energy priorities. The UK deserves an energy strategy that is grounded in technological reality and fiscal responsibility.

Thank you for your continued service to our constituency. I look forward to hearing your views on this matter.

Yours sincerely,
[Your Full Name]
👏73
Forwarded from CRIME CHANNEL 6029679/21 & 01/62447/24
👍52👏1
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
🚨 Stealth Tax Alert — And You Didn’t Vote for It 🚨

Since 2021, the UK government has frozen income tax thresholds — and plans to keep them frozen until 2028. That means more of your income could be taxed, even if your real earnings haven’t increased.

This is called fiscal drag — and it’s quietly pulling millions into higher tax bands. The Office for Budget Responsibility estimates this will raise £29.3 billion a year by 2027–28. All without annual votes in Parliament.

This freeze bypasses the spirit of the Rooker-Wise Amendment (1977), which was meant to stop stealth tax rises by requiring annual inflation-linked adjustments to tax thresholds, unless Parliament explicitly voted annually otherwise.

Most people don’t know this is happening. This is why I am launching a campaign to raise awareness and ask for annual reviews of income tax thresholds.

Read the full story and take action here:https://open.substack.com/pub/clarewillsharrison/p/the-stealth-tax-youve-never-voted?r=18q3db&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true

In the Substack you will find:

- A breakdown of what fiscal drag is and why it matters
- A copy of the letter I have today sent to my MP
- A template letter for you to send to your MP, when enclosing a copy of my letter
- A call to restore transparency and democratic accountability in tax policy

Let’s make this visible. Let’s make it fair. Let's hold MP's to account.

Please consider joining this campaign by sharing this post, and sending the letters in the Substack article.
🔥102👎2👏1
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
If you want to read my letter before you read the article, here is a link to the same

Just hit the link and pick open in browser. You don't need Dropbox installed

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/jfoa8bxmdk7g5f1tip8rl/Letter-to-S-Barclay-Rooker-Wise-signed.pdf?rlkey=x2efnksvg4k3kf0oydppyppsd&st=5qhmm7g9&dl=0
1
Forwarded from Big Brother Watch
🚨Breaking: Sainsbury's has just announced that it will be trialling Orwellian live facial recognition in select UK shops:
📍Sydenham, SE London
📍Oldfield Park, Bath
With plans for nationwide rollout

For one of the UK's largest supermarkets to trial this intrusive tech is deeply disproportionate and chilling.

"Facial recognition surveillance turns shoppers into suspects, with devastating consequences for people’s lives when it inevitably makes mistakes...

Sainsbury's should abandon this trial and the government must urgently step in to prevent the unchecked spread of this invasive technology."

- Madeleine Stone

Read our response in The Guardian⤵️
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/sep/02/sainsburys-tests-facial-recognition-technology-in-effort-to-tackle-shoplifting

Subscribe | @BigBrotherWatchHQ
👍18🔥73
21🔥7
Save the date!
UK Citizen
https://petition.parliament.uk/signatures/160379843/signed
We need to remember that this was never in Labour's manifesto. They do not have a mandate.
👏34👍153🔥1
Some of you may remember the Data (Use and Access) Bill from last year (https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3825#timeline). Well that particular bill received Royal Assent and became law in June 2025. (https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/data-use-and-access-act-2025)

It's probably worth reading it all if you want to understand where the government would like to take us but, if you're only interested in the digital ID aspect then, in Part 2 of the Act there is a section called "Digital Verification Services" (https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2025/18/part/2/enacted).

If you've signed the petition - brilliant. Keep sharing it and encourage others to do the same. However, this new law demonstrates the importance of local face to face connections based on trust and shared values.
👍172
👏8👍1
2025/10/16 16:28:58
Back to Top
HTML Embed Code: