Руководителю делегации ОБСЕ продемонстрировали последствия атаки дронов ВСУ в Видном. Той самой ОБСЕ, которая 8 лет в упор не видела обстрелы ВСУ мирных граждан на Донбассе. Ну кадры с места демонстрации ему последствий ударов по жилому дому будут примерно такими.
Руководителю делегации ОБСЕ продемонстрировали последствия атаки дронов ВСУ в Видном. Той самой ОБСЕ, которая 8 лет в упор не видела обстрелы ВСУ мирных граждан на Донбассе. Ну кадры с места демонстрации ему последствий ударов по жилому дому будут примерно такими.
Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from us
