In hebrews 1 It says "in the past, God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at various times and in Sundry ways" here you have a mention of God, obviously the father, it says he spoke to people in times past through the father's. Then it goes on to say "in these last days he has spoken to us by his son" So here you have a clear distinction between the father being denominated God and The son. But how does the rest of Hebrews go on to identify the son? It clearly goes on to identify him as truly and properly God, every bit as much as the father, whose explicitly called God, right? It says" in these last days, he has spoken to us by his son through whom he created the world'"
In hebrews 1 It says "in the past, God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at various times and in Sundry ways" here you have a mention of God, obviously the father, it says he spoke to people in times past through the father's. Then it goes on to say "in these last days he has spoken to us by his son" So here you have a clear distinction between the father being denominated God and The son. But how does the rest of Hebrews go on to identify the son? It clearly goes on to identify him as truly and properly God, every bit as much as the father, whose explicitly called God, right? It says" in these last days, he has spoken to us by his son through whom he created the world'"
BY Bibel
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from us
