゛➤ взаимный пиар 🎁 каналы с тематикой селфшипп/осканона 0+,с остальной тематикой 200+ пдп ˒˓ могут бы исключения
📣 админы имеют право отказать без причины 📣 повторные вп принимаются через день 📣 канал НЕ поддерживает тех, с кем делает вп и не гарантирует приход на ваш канал 📣 перерыв между вп 10 минут.
♯ртшать только первый закреп！ Навигацию не ртшать 🎀
゛➤ взаимный пиар 🎁 каналы с тематикой селфшипп/осканона 0+,с остальной тематикой 200+ пдп ˒˓ могут бы исключения
📣 админы имеют право отказать без причины 📣 повторные вп принимаются через день 📣 канал НЕ поддерживает тех, с кем делает вп и не гарантирует приход на ваш канал 📣 перерыв между вп 10 минут.
♯ртшать только первый закреп！ Навигацию не ртшать 🎀
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Stocks closed in the red Friday as investors weighed upbeat remarks from Russian President Vladimir Putin about diplomatic discussions with Ukraine against a weaker-than-expected print on U.S. consumer sentiment. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from us
