Мишустин подписал постановление, по которому студенты-участники СВО смогут перевестись на бесплатную форму обучения при перераспределении вакантных мест в вузах. Это будет возможно даже при отсутствии вакантных мест по их направлению подготовки, @kstati_p
Мишустин подписал постановление, по которому студенты-участники СВО смогут перевестись на бесплатную форму обучения при перераспределении вакантных мест в вузах. Это будет возможно даже при отсутствии вакантных мест по их направлению подготовки, @kstati_p
BY КСТАТИ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Since January 2022, the SC has received a total of 47 complaints and enquiries on illegal investment schemes promoted through Telegram. These fraudulent schemes offer non-existent investment opportunities, promising very attractive and risk-free returns within a short span of time. They commonly offer unrealistic returns of as high as 1,000% within 24 hours or even within a few hours. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from us
