🌿KEINE WINDRÄDER im Mühlviertel! (bitte mithelfen!!!)
Wir unterstützen diese Petition mit ganzem Herzen: 👉Erhalt der Mühlviertler Naturlandschaft – Keine weiteren Windräder in den Wäldern des Mühlviertels! Die wertvollen Wälder im Mühlviertel verdienen unseren Schutz. Wir dürfen sie nicht zugunsten von Projekten opfern, die mehr Schaden anrichten als Nutzen bringen.
🌿KEINE WINDRÄDER im Mühlviertel! (bitte mithelfen!!!)
Wir unterstützen diese Petition mit ganzem Herzen: 👉Erhalt der Mühlviertler Naturlandschaft – Keine weiteren Windräder in den Wäldern des Mühlviertels! Die wertvollen Wälder im Mühlviertel verdienen unseren Schutz. Wir dürfen sie nicht zugunsten von Projekten opfern, die mehr Schaden anrichten als Nutzen bringen.
The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
