Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 14739 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 BRIEFING world | Telegram Webview: rusbri/7077 -
Израиль может в дальнейшем расширить свои операции,нацелившись на энергетическую инфраструктуру Ирана, которая является ключевым источником доходов режима, — The Financial Times. @rusbri @brieflyru
Израиль может в дальнейшем расширить свои операции,нацелившись на энергетическую инфраструктуру Ирана, которая является ключевым источником доходов режима, — The Financial Times. @rusbri @brieflyru
BY BRIEFING world
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from us
