Атака произошла сегодня рано утром в районе посёлка Качи. Силы Черноморского флота сбили 2 БПЛА из стрелкового оружия, ещё несколько беспилотников были заглушены и посажены средствами РЭБ. Предварительно, разрушений на земле нет. Информации о пострадавших не поступала.
Атака произошла сегодня рано утром в районе посёлка Качи. Силы Черноморского флота сбили 2 БПЛА из стрелкового оружия, ещё несколько беспилотников были заглушены и посажены средствами РЭБ. Предварительно, разрушений на земле нет. Информации о пострадавших не поступала.
Individual messages can be fully encrypted. But the user has to turn on that function. It's not automatic, as it is on Signal and WhatsApp. Artem Kliuchnikov and his family fled Ukraine just days before the Russian invasion. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee.
from us
