Давайте, господа скажем себе честно, профукали не Асада и даже не Сирию, как важную во многих отношениях страну Ближнего Востока. Профукали огромные финансовые поступления на многие годы в бюджет России, по сути, еще одна потеря сотен миллиардов долларов. Но теперь не в Европе, где у нас своровали 350 миллиардов долларов, неслыханная сумма, а мы сами, наша власть, повторю, отдали то, ради чего было потрачено столько человеческих ресурсов, финансов и военной техники.
Давайте, господа скажем себе честно, профукали не Асада и даже не Сирию, как важную во многих отношениях страну Ближнего Востока. Профукали огромные финансовые поступления на многие годы в бюджет России, по сути, еще одна потеря сотен миллиардов долларов. Но теперь не в Европе, где у нас своровали 350 миллиардов долларов, неслыханная сумма, а мы сами, наша власть, повторю, отдали то, ради чего было потрачено столько человеческих ресурсов, финансов и военной техники.
Since January 2022, the SC has received a total of 47 complaints and enquiries on illegal investment schemes promoted through Telegram. These fraudulent schemes offer non-existent investment opportunities, promising very attractive and risk-free returns within a short span of time. They commonly offer unrealistic returns of as high as 1,000% within 24 hours or even within a few hours. Markets continued to grapple with the economic and corporate earnings implications relating to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. “We have a ton of uncertainty right now,” said Stephanie Link, chief investment strategist and portfolio manager at Hightower Advisors. “We’re dealing with a war, we’re dealing with inflation. We don’t know what it means to earnings.” "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
