Надеюсь в конечном тексте законопроекта найдется место о некомпетентных приказах? Какая ответственность командиров за обнуление батальона, при непроведенной разведке и лобовой атаке?
Если такой ответственности не будет, то 10 лет тюрьмы лучше звучит, чем глупая смерть под пулеметами противника.
А появится уголовная статья за необдуманные потери на медалеопасном направлении?
Надеюсь в конечном тексте законопроекта найдется место о некомпетентных приказах? Какая ответственность командиров за обнуление батальона, при непроведенной разведке и лобовой атаке?
Если такой ответственности не будет, то 10 лет тюрьмы лучше звучит, чем глупая смерть под пулеметами противника.
А появится уголовная статья за необдуманные потери на медалеопасном направлении?
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Perpetrators of these scams will create a public group on Telegram to promote these investment packages that are usually accompanied by fake testimonies and sometimes advertised as being Shariah-compliant. Interested investors will be asked to directly message the representatives to begin investing in the various investment packages offered. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford.
from us
