‼️⚡️Утренняя сводка: массированная атака по Одесской области
Прошедшей ночью по противнику нанесена серия мощных ударов по критической инфраструктуре Одесской области. Основным целям стали портовые объекты.
▪️ Зафиксированы прямые попадания в районе порта Южный ▪️ Одесский порт подвергся серии мощнейших ударов ▪️ На местах взрывы и масштабные возгорания 🇷🇺Секреты Винакоса | Музыка| BOOST
‼️⚡️Утренняя сводка: массированная атака по Одесской области
Прошедшей ночью по противнику нанесена серия мощных ударов по критической инфраструктуре Одесской области. Основным целям стали портовые объекты.
▪️ Зафиксированы прямые попадания в районе порта Южный ▪️ Одесский порт подвергся серии мощнейших ударов ▪️ На местах взрывы и масштабные возгорания 🇷🇺Секреты Винакоса | Музыка| BOOST
'Wild West' At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from us
