🎥 «محمد مهاجری»، روزنامه‌نگار و تحلیلگر اصول‌گرا گفت:«جلیلی قطعا ناکارآمد است و او حتی سابقه اداره یک مغازه را هم نداشته و هیچ کار اجرایی نکرده. از حاج قاسم سلیمانی نقل است که اگر جلیلی رییس‌‌جمهور شود، از نیروی قدس سپاه می‌روم.»
🎥 «محمد مهاجری»، روزنامه‌نگار و تحلیلگر اصول‌گرا گفت:«جلیلی قطعا ناکارآمد است و او حتی سابقه اداره یک مغازه را هم نداشته و هیچ کار اجرایی نکرده. از حاج قاسم سلیمانی نقل است که اگر جلیلی رییس‌‌جمهور شود، از نیروی قدس سپاه می‌روم.»
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications.
from ar
