قالَ رسُولُ الله صلى الله عليه وسلم:" ليسَ أحَدٌ أحَبَّ إليه العِذرُ مِن الله "مسلم. وهذه صفةٌ يحبُّ اللهُ تعالى مِن عِبادِه أن يتخَلَّقوا بها؛ وهي أن يَلتمِسُوا الأَعْذَارَ للمخَالِفين، والمخْطئِين ما أمْكَنَ لذلك سَبِيلاً.
قالَ رسُولُ الله صلى الله عليه وسلم:" ليسَ أحَدٌ أحَبَّ إليه العِذرُ مِن الله "مسلم. وهذه صفةٌ يحبُّ اللهُ تعالى مِن عِبادِه أن يتخَلَّقوا بها؛ وهي أن يَلتمِسُوا الأَعْذَارَ للمخَالِفين، والمخْطئِين ما أمْكَنَ لذلك سَبِيلاً.
BY الصفحة الرسمية للشيخ أبي بصير الطرطوسي
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Telegram users are able to send files of any type up to 2GB each and access them from any device, with no limit on cloud storage, which has made downloading files more popular on the platform. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ar
