❗️Предлагаем ознакомиться с интервью директора Консульского департамента МИД России А.В.Климова РИА Новости.
🔹В интервью освещены перспективы развития проекта электронных виз и расширения российского консульского присутствия за рубежом, а также приводится некоторая статистика объемов консульской работы российских загранучреждений. 🔹Кроме того, излагаются походы Российской Федерации к применению ответных мер на действия недружественных государств, усложняющих получение виз российскими гражданами.
❗️Предлагаем ознакомиться с интервью директора Консульского департамента МИД России А.В.Климова РИА Новости.
🔹В интервью освещены перспективы развития проекта электронных виз и расширения российского консульского присутствия за рубежом, а также приводится некоторая статистика объемов консульской работы российских загранучреждений. 🔹Кроме того, излагаются походы Российской Федерации к применению ответных мер на действия недружественных государств, усложняющих получение виз российскими гражданами.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The Security Service of Ukraine said in a tweet that it was able to effectively target Russian convoys near Kyiv because of messages sent to an official Telegram bot account called "STOP Russian War." A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts.
from ar
