НАУЧНЫЙ ЮРИДИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ ПАНДЕМИЧЕСКОГО СОГЛАШЕНИЯ ВОЗ ЧЕРЕЗ ПРИЗМУ НАЦИОНАЛЬНОЙ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ
Понкин И.В.
О противоречиях разработанного Всемирной организацией здравоохранения проекта «пандемийного соглашения» публичному порядку и национальным интересам Российской Федерации:
НАУЧНЫЙ ЮРИДИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ ПАНДЕМИЧЕСКОГО СОГЛАШЕНИЯ ВОЗ ЧЕРЕЗ ПРИЗМУ НАЦИОНАЛЬНОЙ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ
Понкин И.В.
О противоречиях разработанного Всемирной организацией здравоохранения проекта «пандемийного соглашения» публичному порядку и национальным интересам Российской Федерации:
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. I want a secure messaging app, should I use Telegram? In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. 'Wild West'
from us
