🔴بيان القوات المسلحة اليمنية بشأن قصف أهداف حساسة عدة للعدو الإسرائيلي في محيط مدينة القدس المحتلة بصاروخ باليستي فرط صوتي نوع "فلسطين2" الانشطاري متعدد الرؤوس و 3 طائرات مسيّرة استهدفت مطار "رامون" وهدفين حيويين في منطقة أم الرشراش جنوبي فلسطين المحتلة 17-03-1447هـ 09-09-2025م
🔴بيان القوات المسلحة اليمنية بشأن قصف أهداف حساسة عدة للعدو الإسرائيلي في محيط مدينة القدس المحتلة بصاروخ باليستي فرط صوتي نوع "فلسطين2" الانشطاري متعدد الرؤوس و 3 طائرات مسيّرة استهدفت مطار "رامون" وهدفين حيويين في منطقة أم الرشراش جنوبي فلسطين المحتلة 17-03-1447هـ 09-09-2025م
#ثابتون_مع_غزة #يمن_الواثقين_بالله
BY #الحقيقة
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app.
from br
