🔴مقتل الأخ سامر محمد برو ابو دياب القائد المجاهد في صفوف الثوره من عام 2011 على يد فلول النظام المدعو جمال كنعان المعروف لدى القريه بانتسابه للدفاع الوطني #ريف_دمشق_القلمون_فليطة 🔴قدمت عدة دعاوي ضده في القريه وقامت الدوله باعتقاله والإفراج عنه بعد عدة ايام بعد دفعه مبلغ مالي ضخم ليقدم اليوم على هذه الجريمه
🔴مقتل الأخ سامر محمد برو ابو دياب القائد المجاهد في صفوف الثوره من عام 2011 على يد فلول النظام المدعو جمال كنعان المعروف لدى القريه بانتسابه للدفاع الوطني #ريف_دمشق_القلمون_فليطة 🔴قدمت عدة دعاوي ضده في القريه وقامت الدوله باعتقاله والإفراج عنه بعد عدة ايام بعد دفعه مبلغ مالي ضخم ليقدم اليوم على هذه الجريمه
Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from ca
