Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Philosophy of mind - worth it in 2024?

A relatively recent Giulio Tononi talk (IIT theory) at my university (not recorded) sparkled my interest in consciousness research. Turns out this area is exactly what seemed most fun to me even though I did not realize it.

After all, all there is to catch the Zen of this life it is to make sense about thy own mind...

2022 - 2023 presented us with lively debates about the neural basis of consciousness, with the most prominent opponents being integrated information theory (IIT) and global workspace theory (GWT). I recommend checking out this nature letter for more info on the clash between theories. Additionally, there is a cool review by A.Seth and T.Bayne about neuro-consciousness theories.

I came to conclusion that to even start digging into it neural basis of consciousness, might be useful to look at what our fellow philosophers of mind did (over the course of the last 300 years...). To my surprise, it does not seem that at least John Seerle (the author of a famous Chinese room thought experiment) is incompetent in the neural part of mind-body approaches.

I have to admit as a snob computational neuroscientist I highly doubt non-empirical reasoning. However, the philosophy of mind course by J.Seerle seems super fun and comprehensive. So far it discussed relationships between syntax and semantics, computational theory of the mind, different forms and shapes of materialism, connectionism and others, with the focus on heavy critiques of those 😁

So for anyone like me, trying to get the grasp on mind and body relationships while staying true to the rational, emprical neuroscience , I highly recommend this course (I listen to it like a podcast). Super fun and informative, an easy listen.

▶️ [youtube playlist link]

The plan is to finally understand IIT and neural theories of consciousness after being armed with philosophical arguments. Good luck to me/us 🕺
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM



group-telegram.com/neural_cell/200
Create:
Last Update:

Philosophy of mind - worth it in 2024?

A relatively recent Giulio Tononi talk (IIT theory) at my university (not recorded) sparkled my interest in consciousness research. Turns out this area is exactly what seemed most fun to me even though I did not realize it.

After all, all there is to catch the Zen of this life it is to make sense about thy own mind...

2022 - 2023 presented us with lively debates about the neural basis of consciousness, with the most prominent opponents being integrated information theory (IIT) and global workspace theory (GWT). I recommend checking out this nature letter for more info on the clash between theories. Additionally, there is a cool review by A.Seth and T.Bayne about neuro-consciousness theories.

I came to conclusion that to even start digging into it neural basis of consciousness, might be useful to look at what our fellow philosophers of mind did (over the course of the last 300 years...). To my surprise, it does not seem that at least John Seerle (the author of a famous Chinese room thought experiment) is incompetent in the neural part of mind-body approaches.

I have to admit as a snob computational neuroscientist I highly doubt non-empirical reasoning. However, the philosophy of mind course by J.Seerle seems super fun and comprehensive. So far it discussed relationships between syntax and semantics, computational theory of the mind, different forms and shapes of materialism, connectionism and others, with the focus on heavy critiques of those 😁

So for anyone like me, trying to get the grasp on mind and body relationships while staying true to the rational, emprical neuroscience , I highly recommend this course (I listen to it like a podcast). Super fun and informative, an easy listen.

▶️ [youtube playlist link]

The plan is to finally understand IIT and neural theories of consciousness after being armed with philosophical arguments. Good luck to me/us 🕺

BY the last neural cell




Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/neural_cell/200

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. The news also helped traders look past another report showing decades-high inflation and shake off some of the volatility from recent sessions. The Bureau of Labor Statistics' February Consumer Price Index (CPI) this week showed another surge in prices even before Russia escalated its attacks in Ukraine. The headline CPI — soaring 7.9% over last year — underscored the sticky inflationary pressures reverberating across the U.S. economy, with everything from groceries to rents and airline fares getting more expensive for everyday consumers. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Perpetrators of such fraud use various marketing techniques to attract subscribers on their social media channels. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change.
from ca


Telegram the last neural cell
FROM American