Минувшей ночью над территорией пяти муниципалитетов Воронежской области дежурными силами ПВО было уничтожено более 30 БПЛА.
По информации на данный момент, пострадавших и разрушений нет. В одном из районов в результате падения фрагментов беспилотника загорелась сухая трава. Огонь оперативно потушили.
Минувшей ночью над территорией пяти муниципалитетов Воронежской области дежурными силами ПВО было уничтожено более 30 БПЛА.
По информации на данный момент, пострадавших и разрушений нет. В одном из районов в результате падения фрагментов беспилотника загорелась сухая трава. Огонь оперативно потушили.
Опасность атаки БПЛА в регионе сохраняется.
BY Гусев
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from cn
