Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Honestly, I don't know who will win in the end, drones or rebs, but the fact remains that future liquidations will be carried out with the help of drones, not movie guys with fancy rifles with silencers and scopes, waiting for their prey, etc.

The liquidators will blend in with civilians. They won't wear masks or carry large suitcases. They'll just close the curtains and do their dirty work.

It will be virtually impossible to find them — the radius is not the same — if the pilot is 20 km away, there is no chance unless you jam all communications or keep drones in the sky that can intercept the liquidator's bird.

Cars for top officials will also change — they already have to be able to withstand a direct hit from an FPV and have a radar or at least a radar that will show the approach of an object flying overhead. The first car manufacturer to announce such know-how as protection against being taken out will take most of the market for many years to come.

I will say even more: shootouts with small arms are essentially meaningless — it is easier to send 20 FPVs at the enemy, which will fly into the windows of their competitors. It is easier, cheaper, and more effective than competing with competitors or enemies in accuracy.

Killing with a drone will become as common as death from a kitchen knife during a drunken brawl.

Drones will push cars off cliffs, change the course of cars to cause accidents, fly into the offices of the most important people, and destroy ship navigation systems.

They will even replace suicide bombers, who, instead of going to their targets, will launch swarms of drones carrying screws and other weapons from 15-50 km away.

The world has changed. It has become much more dangerous than it was during the pandemic. And this world does not know how to deal with the future threat.

This is a new weapon that is cheap and accessible to virtually everyone. It can be assembled anywhere without arousing suspicion. The perpetrator does not need to carry a rifle with them; they just need to receive 4-5 different parcels and assemble everything on site. Even the drone itself does not need to be purchased in assembled form.

Add to this underground production facilities that will fly despite the nominal obstacles posed by police robots, plus a charge that can destroy a tank.

Personally, I have no idea how to defend against this. Unless we're talking about full-blown cyberpunk, with patrol drones or something like that flying around in the sky.

There's no need to mine a car and drive it into a crowd with a suicide bomber — for the same money, you can build drones and do the same thing.

You have to think about how to protect the wheels of a car from being hit by an FPV at full speed and how not to lose control while doing so.

You don't need a man-portable air defence system to shoot down the right plane — all you need is 5-7 drones and operators sitting 100 km away who will destroy the plane as it gains altitude or after all the passengers have taken their seats.

We need to start thinking about how many drone strikes your windows or doors can withstand.

Yes, in five years' time, there will be some kind of compromise solution for REBs and protection against kamikaze drones, but that will be later. Today, we are on the verge of the mass use of drones as a tool for destroying enemies in civilian life.

Rockets are necessary. However, it is cheaper to send a group of people who will assemble the drones on site and then destroy a strategic target from 30 km away. No balaclavas, no masks, no infiltrating a restricted facility, no ninja tricks or crazy dialogue during a secret mission — just close the curtains, sit back in your chair, and take out the target (without even getting your hands dirty, and the mission is accomplished).
👇👇👇👇



group-telegram.com/gistapapapa/109513
Create:
Last Update:

Honestly, I don't know who will win in the end, drones or rebs, but the fact remains that future liquidations will be carried out with the help of drones, not movie guys with fancy rifles with silencers and scopes, waiting for their prey, etc.

The liquidators will blend in with civilians. They won't wear masks or carry large suitcases. They'll just close the curtains and do their dirty work.

It will be virtually impossible to find them — the radius is not the same — if the pilot is 20 km away, there is no chance unless you jam all communications or keep drones in the sky that can intercept the liquidator's bird.

Cars for top officials will also change — they already have to be able to withstand a direct hit from an FPV and have a radar or at least a radar that will show the approach of an object flying overhead. The first car manufacturer to announce such know-how as protection against being taken out will take most of the market for many years to come.

I will say even more: shootouts with small arms are essentially meaningless — it is easier to send 20 FPVs at the enemy, which will fly into the windows of their competitors. It is easier, cheaper, and more effective than competing with competitors or enemies in accuracy.

Killing with a drone will become as common as death from a kitchen knife during a drunken brawl.

Drones will push cars off cliffs, change the course of cars to cause accidents, fly into the offices of the most important people, and destroy ship navigation systems.

They will even replace suicide bombers, who, instead of going to their targets, will launch swarms of drones carrying screws and other weapons from 15-50 km away.

The world has changed. It has become much more dangerous than it was during the pandemic. And this world does not know how to deal with the future threat.

This is a new weapon that is cheap and accessible to virtually everyone. It can be assembled anywhere without arousing suspicion. The perpetrator does not need to carry a rifle with them; they just need to receive 4-5 different parcels and assemble everything on site. Even the drone itself does not need to be purchased in assembled form.

Add to this underground production facilities that will fly despite the nominal obstacles posed by police robots, plus a charge that can destroy a tank.

Personally, I have no idea how to defend against this. Unless we're talking about full-blown cyberpunk, with patrol drones or something like that flying around in the sky.

There's no need to mine a car and drive it into a crowd with a suicide bomber — for the same money, you can build drones and do the same thing.

You have to think about how to protect the wheels of a car from being hit by an FPV at full speed and how not to lose control while doing so.

You don't need a man-portable air defence system to shoot down the right plane — all you need is 5-7 drones and operators sitting 100 km away who will destroy the plane as it gains altitude or after all the passengers have taken their seats.

We need to start thinking about how many drone strikes your windows or doors can withstand.

Yes, in five years' time, there will be some kind of compromise solution for REBs and protection against kamikaze drones, but that will be later. Today, we are on the verge of the mass use of drones as a tool for destroying enemies in civilian life.

Rockets are necessary. However, it is cheaper to send a group of people who will assemble the drones on site and then destroy a strategic target from 30 km away. No balaclavas, no masks, no infiltrating a restricted facility, no ninja tricks or crazy dialogue during a secret mission — just close the curtains, sit back in your chair, and take out the target (without even getting your hands dirty, and the mission is accomplished).
👇👇👇👇

BY Фашик Донецький




Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/gistapapapa/109513

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. The news also helped traders look past another report showing decades-high inflation and shake off some of the volatility from recent sessions. The Bureau of Labor Statistics' February Consumer Price Index (CPI) this week showed another surge in prices even before Russia escalated its attacks in Ukraine. The headline CPI — soaring 7.9% over last year — underscored the sticky inflationary pressures reverberating across the U.S. economy, with everything from groceries to rents and airline fares getting more expensive for everyday consumers. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into."
from de


Telegram Фашик Донецький
FROM American