— Как вы планируете провести это лето? — Довольно-таки неплохо, очень даже приятно 😎
Так вы точно сможете ответить, если станете участником этих мероприятий 👇
▶️ Мастерская новых медиа запустила отбор на обучение для продюсеров, режиссеров и медиатехнологов; ▶️ «СпортТрек» обновил мониторинг физической активности и реферальную систему; ▶️ Росмолодёжь проведет программу для организаторов молодежных событий.
Это были все новости к этому часу, а еще больше возможностей ждет вас на платформе😏
— Как вы планируете провести это лето? — Довольно-таки неплохо, очень даже приятно 😎
Так вы точно сможете ответить, если станете участником этих мероприятий 👇
▶️ Мастерская новых медиа запустила отбор на обучение для продюсеров, режиссеров и медиатехнологов; ▶️ «СпортТрек» обновил мониторинг физической активности и реферальную систему; ▶️ Росмолодёжь проведет программу для организаторов молодежных событий.
Это были все новости к этому часу, а еще больше возможностей ждет вас на платформе😏
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from de
