Woran mag es wohl liegen? Sorgen vor einer unsicheren Zukunft in der Heimat? Geringerer Lebensstandard, die verbreitete Korruption oder doch Angst vor Selenskyj und Anhang? Welche Rolle spielt das Bürgergeld? Fragen über Fragen!
Woran mag es wohl liegen? Sorgen vor einer unsicheren Zukunft in der Heimat? Geringerer Lebensstandard, die verbreitete Korruption oder doch Angst vor Selenskyj und Anhang? Welche Rolle spielt das Bürgergeld? Fragen über Fragen!
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. In the past, it was noticed that through bulk SMSes, investors were induced to invest in or purchase the stocks of certain listed companies. There was another possible development: Reuters also reported that Ukraine said that Belarus could soon join the invasion of Ukraine. However, the AFP, citing a Pentagon official, said the U.S. hasn’t yet seen evidence that Belarusian troops are in Ukraine. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from us
