@ezdevajeroyaeiii 🕊ازدواجدائم آقا🤵 #کردستان #سنندج ❥❤️ازدواج قبلی بله دو دختر پیش خانمم ✫✮سن ۳۵ سال 'قد ۱۸۲ وزن ۷۰ ❥❤️تحصیلات: اولدبیرستان ✫✮شغل: بنا ومعمار ✫✮ماشین بله خانه بله ❥❤️وضعیت جسمی شکر خدا سالم ✫✮ #معیارها:خواهان خانمی باشخصیت و محترم و اهل دروغ و کلک نباشه تا یه دختر هم داشته باشه قبول میکنم و ❗️سنشون از ۳۲سال تا ۴۲ سال باشه و فقط ازدواج دائم تا یک ماه اشنایی بعد ازدواج بقیه حرفها بماند به وقت که باهم اشنا بشیم 💢ID:👉@astglalii
@ezdevajeroyaeiii 🕊ازدواجدائم آقا🤵 #کردستان #سنندج ❥❤️ازدواج قبلی بله دو دختر پیش خانمم ✫✮سن ۳۵ سال 'قد ۱۸۲ وزن ۷۰ ❥❤️تحصیلات: اولدبیرستان ✫✮شغل: بنا ومعمار ✫✮ماشین بله خانه بله ❥❤️وضعیت جسمی شکر خدا سالم ✫✮ #معیارها:خواهان خانمی باشخصیت و محترم و اهل دروغ و کلک نباشه تا یه دختر هم داشته باشه قبول میکنم و ❗️سنشون از ۳۲سال تا ۴۲ سال باشه و فقط ازدواج دائم تا یک ماه اشنایی بعد ازدواج بقیه حرفها بماند به وقت که باهم اشنا بشیم 💢ID:👉@astglalii
BY ازدواج همسریابی دائم رویایی
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from es