Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
MODEL ESSAY
Sherlock Holmes, arguably the most popular fictional detective, was able to identify a person’s true nature simply by watching them walk or hold a conversation. We ordinary folk are far from ever being able to emulate such feats, but something that is generally believed to be feasible is to learn a person’s background and personality based solely on their outfit. While I agree that a lot can be shown by the clothes that a person wears, I also think that this information is not sufficient to paint a complete picture of a person’s identity, and, therefore, we should not rely on it to judge others.
On the one hand, I can see why people believe that there is a connection between clothes and identity. One can argue that a person’s traits and values often manifest themselves in the colour and type of clothes that they tend to choose, which can be backed up by a vast amount of anecdotal evidence. We can safely assume that a shy person, who would want to shield themselves from a public eye, would choose more modest garments in pale colours so as not to attract any unnecessary attention. Meanwhile, bright colours and a more revealing outfit may suggest higher levels of confidence and willingness to engage in interactions with other people.
With the cultural background, the link becomes even more definite. Traditional clothes can help, with some acceptable degree of inaccuracy, indicate the country of origin and, more importantly, the cultural values connected with this geographic region. A person does not even have to wear a complete set of traditional garments – just a few regional variations in style, such as a certain way to wear a scarf or a hat, would be enough to determine the origin of this specific individual. True, someone dressed in the Mexican poncho or the Japanese kimono might not necessarily come from those countries or be a follower of the respective cultures, but this should rather be treated as an exception to the otherwise universal rule.
With all that being said, I would still have to point out that regardless of how much we can learn from a person’s choice of clothes, I would not advise to use this information as a basis for our judgement of other people. For one, the same outfit can be worn by people with completely different personalities who had completely different reasons to choose it. For example, a shy person might try on a bolder, more defiant outfit as a defense mechanism to hide their inner personality issue. Just like this, a person wearing baggy clothes does not necessarily struggle with accepting their physical appearance, as would be commonly thought, but may just feel comfortable wearing it.
Furthermore, thanks to globalisation and, more specifically, Westernisation, there is progressively less diversity in clothes around the world. People now trade their traditional outfits for more fashionable and good-looking Western clothes such as jeans and T-shirts, so it becomes close to impossible to identify their origin by looking at what they have decided to wear. This situation is further exacerbated when celebrities, from musicians and singers to company CEOs and political leaders, conform to a uniform clothing standard, encouraging the masses to follow these styles. In this context, clothes have become just an outer shell separated from the actual nature of an individual, so it is outright wrong to judge a person based on their clothing habits.
In conclusion, there is no denying that clothes are, in a certain way, a reflection of a person’s background and personality. However, I believe that the picture of a person that can be painted with this information in mind is seriously incomplete, so we cannot rely on it to judge other people.
Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
MODEL ESSAY
Sherlock Holmes, arguably the most popular fictional detective, was able to identify a person’s true nature simply by watching them walk or hold a conversation. We ordinary folk are far from ever being able to emulate such feats, but something that is generally believed to be feasible is to learn a person’s background and personality based solely on their outfit. While I agree that a lot can be shown by the clothes that a person wears, I also think that this information is not sufficient to paint a complete picture of a person’s identity, and, therefore, we should not rely on it to judge others.
On the one hand, I can see why people believe that there is a connection between clothes and identity. One can argue that a person’s traits and values often manifest themselves in the colour and type of clothes that they tend to choose, which can be backed up by a vast amount of anecdotal evidence. We can safely assume that a shy person, who would want to shield themselves from a public eye, would choose more modest garments in pale colours so as not to attract any unnecessary attention. Meanwhile, bright colours and a more revealing outfit may suggest higher levels of confidence and willingness to engage in interactions with other people.
With the cultural background, the link becomes even more definite. Traditional clothes can help, with some acceptable degree of inaccuracy, indicate the country of origin and, more importantly, the cultural values connected with this geographic region. A person does not even have to wear a complete set of traditional garments – just a few regional variations in style, such as a certain way to wear a scarf or a hat, would be enough to determine the origin of this specific individual. True, someone dressed in the Mexican poncho or the Japanese kimono might not necessarily come from those countries or be a follower of the respective cultures, but this should rather be treated as an exception to the otherwise universal rule.
With all that being said, I would still have to point out that regardless of how much we can learn from a person’s choice of clothes, I would not advise to use this information as a basis for our judgement of other people. For one, the same outfit can be worn by people with completely different personalities who had completely different reasons to choose it. For example, a shy person might try on a bolder, more defiant outfit as a defense mechanism to hide their inner personality issue. Just like this, a person wearing baggy clothes does not necessarily struggle with accepting their physical appearance, as would be commonly thought, but may just feel comfortable wearing it.
Furthermore, thanks to globalisation and, more specifically, Westernisation, there is progressively less diversity in clothes around the world. People now trade their traditional outfits for more fashionable and good-looking Western clothes such as jeans and T-shirts, so it becomes close to impossible to identify their origin by looking at what they have decided to wear. This situation is further exacerbated when celebrities, from musicians and singers to company CEOs and political leaders, conform to a uniform clothing standard, encouraging the masses to follow these styles. In this context, clothes have become just an outer shell separated from the actual nature of an individual, so it is outright wrong to judge a person based on their clothing habits.
In conclusion, there is no denying that clothes are, in a certain way, a reflection of a person’s background and personality. However, I believe that the picture of a person that can be painted with this information in mind is seriously incomplete, so we cannot rely on it to judge other people.
(669 words)
BY IELTS with Farrukh | IELTS 9.0
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The perpetrators use various names to carry out the investment scams. They may also impersonate or clone licensed capital market intermediaries by using the names, logos, credentials, websites and other details of the legitimate entities to promote the illegal schemes. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events."
from es
