Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Thanks to Morgoth, I'm thinking back to when I first consciously chose to step out of the system's frame.

It was the mid-1980s when I decided to stop consuming "news", the steady flow of Current Things that even with the primitive technology of the time would set the discourse via radio, television and print.

Why did I stop? What was the point?

Initially, I thought I could handle the bias of the media, which was very clear to me. I knew they were enemies and that they didn't like me or my people. So if they leaned one way on an issue, I could just choose to lean the other way.

But eventually I realized it wasn't that simple. There was another level to the game. The very selection of what issues were in play was in their control. Perhaps more importantly were the things they would never put any attention on. Some things would never be the Current Thing.

Their power to set the frame was not so easy to counteract. How would I find my way to more fundamental issues that they would never talk about while my attention was being swamped every day?

It was a bit of a leap of faith when I stopped. I chose to believe that there was something out there beyond the boundaries of the official frame. And my decision didn't bear immediate fruit. I cast about for a while, trying some more partisan outlets that didn't profess to be "objective news".

But it wasn't really that long before I found myself outside of the options that had been presented to me.

I was no longer consumed by trying to decide between Republicans and Democrats for example. I was happy to recognize both of them as part of a larger system that I rejected.

That simple decision I made in high school to just stop continues to help me be radical, that is, to go to the root to this day.

Let go of being "in the know", of giving your hot take on the issue of the day.

Just stop.



group-telegram.com/RadicalLiberation/2159
Create:
Last Update:

Thanks to Morgoth, I'm thinking back to when I first consciously chose to step out of the system's frame.

It was the mid-1980s when I decided to stop consuming "news", the steady flow of Current Things that even with the primitive technology of the time would set the discourse via radio, television and print.

Why did I stop? What was the point?

Initially, I thought I could handle the bias of the media, which was very clear to me. I knew they were enemies and that they didn't like me or my people. So if they leaned one way on an issue, I could just choose to lean the other way.

But eventually I realized it wasn't that simple. There was another level to the game. The very selection of what issues were in play was in their control. Perhaps more importantly were the things they would never put any attention on. Some things would never be the Current Thing.

Their power to set the frame was not so easy to counteract. How would I find my way to more fundamental issues that they would never talk about while my attention was being swamped every day?

It was a bit of a leap of faith when I stopped. I chose to believe that there was something out there beyond the boundaries of the official frame. And my decision didn't bear immediate fruit. I cast about for a while, trying some more partisan outlets that didn't profess to be "objective news".

But it wasn't really that long before I found myself outside of the options that had been presented to me.

I was no longer consumed by trying to decide between Republicans and Democrats for example. I was happy to recognize both of them as part of a larger system that I rejected.

That simple decision I made in high school to just stop continues to help me be radical, that is, to go to the root to this day.

Let go of being "in the know", of giving your hot take on the issue of the day.

Just stop.

BY Radical Liberation


Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260

Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/RadicalLiberation/2159

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. And while money initially moved into stocks in the morning, capital moved out of safe-haven assets. The price of the 10-year Treasury note fell Friday, sending its yield up to 2% from a March closing low of 1.73%. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones.
from fr


Telegram Radical Liberation
FROM American