Религиозную политику 404 страны раскритиковали в ООН.
Управление верховного комиссара по правам человека в своём отчёте отметила, что власти Незалежной ввели «несоразмерные ограничения на свободу исповедовать свою религию или убеждения», тем самым поставив под угрозу право на свободу выражения мнений.
Только киевскому режиму до этого нет никакого дела. Они и дальше пытаются уничтожать УПЦ.
Религиозную политику 404 страны раскритиковали в ООН.
Управление верховного комиссара по правам человека в своём отчёте отметила, что власти Незалежной ввели «несоразмерные ограничения на свободу исповедовать свою религию или убеждения», тем самым поставив под угрозу право на свободу выражения мнений.
Только киевскому режиму до этого нет никакого дела. Они и дальше пытаются уничтожать УПЦ.
Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. NEWS You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from fr
