Генеральный директор YouTube Сьюзн Воджицки просит государство написать законы, которые будут внятно ограничивать свободу слова. Причём желательно не только в интернете.
Номенклатура любит использовать бигтех для борьбы с неугодными политиками. Но это приводит к бегству пользователей на более свободные площадки. Чтобы не позволить таким площадкам появиться, бигтех просит государство о помощи. Так государство коррумпирует бизнес и создаёт олигополии.
Генеральный директор YouTube Сьюзн Воджицки просит государство написать законы, которые будут внятно ограничивать свободу слова. Причём желательно не только в интернете.
Номенклатура любит использовать бигтех для борьбы с неугодными политиками. Но это приводит к бегству пользователей на более свободные площадки. Чтобы не позволить таким площадкам появиться, бигтех просит государство о помощи. Так государство коррумпирует бизнес и создаёт олигополии.
In the past, it was noticed that through bulk SMSes, investors were induced to invest in or purchase the stocks of certain listed companies. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said.
from fr
