Штирлиц номер 2 тем временем ещё ближе к провалу: 73% избирателей LFI (и непонятно зачем приписанных к ним коммунистов) считают, что ислам вполне соответствует ценностям Франции. В целом такую точки зрения разделяют 42% французов, в то время как иудаизм считают близким к ценностям страны 79% опрошенных, а католицизм — 91%.
Штирлиц номер 2 тем временем ещё ближе к провалу: 73% избирателей LFI (и непонятно зачем приписанных к ним коммунистов) считают, что ислам вполне соответствует ценностям Франции. В целом такую точки зрения разделяют 42% французов, в то время как иудаизм считают близким к ценностям страны 79% опрошенных, а католицизм — 91%.
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from us
