«در دورهی رضاخان، تضاد اساسی جامعهی ایران، تضادی بود میان «خلق» یعنی بورژوازی ملی، کارگران، خردهبورژوازی، دهقانان و تودههای عشایر با «ارتجاع حاکم» ـ یعنی امپریالیسم، بورژوازیکمپرادور و فئودالیسم. این امر به آن معناست که در جامعهی ایرانِ آن زمان، یک فرماسیون کامل و یکدست، مانند فئودالیسم یا سرمایهداری، حاکم نبود.»
«در دورهی رضاخان، تضاد اساسی جامعهی ایران، تضادی بود میان «خلق» یعنی بورژوازی ملی، کارگران، خردهبورژوازی، دهقانان و تودههای عشایر با «ارتجاع حاکم» ـ یعنی امپریالیسم، بورژوازیکمپرادور و فئودالیسم. این امر به آن معناست که در جامعهی ایرانِ آن زمان، یک فرماسیون کامل و یکدست، مانند فئودالیسم یا سرمایهداری، حاکم نبود.»
"We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from us
