1. Военная форма по погоде и времени года, аналогичная той, в которой вы будете выполнять боевые задачи + перчатки, наколенники. 2. Такая же обувь. 3. Рюкзак грузовой или штурмовой. 4. Туристическая палатка. 5. Спальник. 6. Коврик. 7. Спички, зажигалка. 8. Топор. 9. Нож. 10. Чашка, ложка, кружка. 11. Влажные салфетки. 12. Мобильный телефон, повербанк, провода к ним. 13. Вода 3 литра. 14. Скотч. 15. Верёвка 10 метров. 16. Тапочки. 17. Мыльно-рыльное (зубные щётка и паста, мыло, полотенце). 18. Пила. 19. Ремкомплект (иголки, нитки, напёрсток). 20. Паспорт, деньги на проезд.
1. Военная форма по погоде и времени года, аналогичная той, в которой вы будете выполнять боевые задачи + перчатки, наколенники. 2. Такая же обувь. 3. Рюкзак грузовой или штурмовой. 4. Туристическая палатка. 5. Спальник. 6. Коврик. 7. Спички, зажигалка. 8. Топор. 9. Нож. 10. Чашка, ложка, кружка. 11. Влажные салфетки. 12. Мобильный телефон, повербанк, провода к ним. 13. Вода 3 литра. 14. Скотч. 15. Верёвка 10 метров. 16. Тапочки. 17. Мыльно-рыльное (зубные щётка и паста, мыло, полотенце). 18. Пила. 19. Ремкомплект (иголки, нитки, напёрсток). 20. Паспорт, деньги на проезд.
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Telegram users are able to send files of any type up to 2GB each and access them from any device, with no limit on cloud storage, which has made downloading files more popular on the platform. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. The regulator said it had received information that messages containing stock tips and other investment advice with respect to selected listed companies are being widely circulated through websites and social media platforms such as Telegram, Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram.
from hk
