Паки видать что-то зацепили рефлекторно, и сами затряслись что за это отдельно получат.
Коллизия в том, что стеречь воздушное пространство — это одно, а защищать от налёта ВВС лагеря террористов — немного другое. Их и быть не должно было на суверенной-то территории. Но стейт на той территории немножко фейлд, и даже совсем фейлд.
Паки видать что-то зацепили рефлекторно, и сами затряслись что за это отдельно получат.
Коллизия в том, что стеречь воздушное пространство — это одно, а защищать от налёта ВВС лагеря террористов — немного другое. Их и быть не должно было на суверенной-то территории. Но стейт на той территории немножко фейлд, и даже совсем фейлд.
BY Шорты Шахова 18+
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from hk
