ВП пост! 0 + - - - - - - - - - - - -∴ вп делается со всеми видами каналов (сетки, подслушки, кф, дейли, триггер т.д.) но не принимаем нсфв, треш каналы и те, что противоречат нашим дни. промежуток между вп 5 минут. мы НЕ несём ответственности за каналы с которыми делаем вп.
ВП пост! 0 + - - - - - - - - - - - -∴ вп делается со всеми видами каналов (сетки, подслушки, кф, дейли, триггер т.д.) но не принимаем нсфв, треш каналы и те, что противоречат нашим дни. промежуток между вп 5 минут. мы НЕ несём ответственности за каналы с которыми делаем вп.
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation." On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from id
