Невероятной смелости пост: мужчина прогнал тигра в лесу Приморья.
Дядя почти нос к носу столкнулся с хищником около села Васильковка Спасского района, но не засмущался и русским матерным отправил его в чащу. Удивительно послушный кот тут же скрылся среди деревьев.
Невероятной смелости пост: мужчина прогнал тигра в лесу Приморья.
Дядя почти нос к носу столкнулся с хищником около села Васильковка Спасского района, но не засмущался и русским матерным отправил его в чащу. Удивительно послушный кот тут же скрылся среди деревьев.
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Meanwhile, a completely redesigned attachment menu appears when sending multiple photos or vides. Users can tap "X selected" (X being the number of items) at the top of the panel to preview how the album will look in the chat when it's sent, as well as rearrange or remove selected media. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from id
