Warning: mkdir(): No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 37
Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/maximgrigoryev/--): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 ГРИГОРЬЕВ | Telegram Webview: maximgrigoryev/7933 -
"7 августа я выезжал из Суджи на объездную дорогу. Вижу, двое с синими повязками на голове и руке и один из них берет на прицел мою машину. Я резко надавил на газ, но сразу услышал выстрелы — пули пробили стекла и кузов машины. Потерял на мгновение сознание, но продолжил движение. По дороге стояли расстрелянные и сгоревшие гражданские машины.
Стреляли из американской винтовки, по словам военных, автоматической М-16. В больнице из меня извлекли 12 фрагментов, три осколка остались в теле."
"7 августа я выезжал из Суджи на объездную дорогу. Вижу, двое с синими повязками на голове и руке и один из них берет на прицел мою машину. Я резко надавил на газ, но сразу услышал выстрелы — пули пробили стекла и кузов машины. Потерял на мгновение сознание, но продолжил движение. По дороге стояли расстрелянные и сгоревшие гражданские машины.
Стреляли из американской винтовки, по словам военных, автоматической М-16. В больнице из меня извлекли 12 фрагментов, три осколка остались в теле."
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy."
from id
