Добрый день! Консультировалась с окулистами по поводу капель. Вообще не рекомендуют. Изначально это капли для снижения внутриглазного давления, если оно в норме, то использование этого препарата для купирования приступа мигрени может быть небезопасно для глаз. Получается, одно лечим другое калечим. В РЛС этот препарат рекомендуют принимать именно внутрь в таблетках по 20 и 10 мг, дважды в день, а не в каплях. И, скорее всего, он не идёт как монотерапия и разово, надо принимать в комплексе и постоянно. Так что, капли вряд ли можно рассматривать как панацею. Эххх, а я так надеялась.
Добрый день! Консультировалась с окулистами по поводу капель. Вообще не рекомендуют. Изначально это капли для снижения внутриглазного давления, если оно в норме, то использование этого препарата для купирования приступа мигрени может быть небезопасно для глаз. Получается, одно лечим другое калечим. В РЛС этот препарат рекомендуют принимать именно внутрь в таблетках по 20 и 10 мг, дважды в день, а не в каплях. И, скорее всего, он не идёт как монотерапия и разово, надо принимать в комплексе и постоянно. Так что, капли вряд ли можно рассматривать как панацею. Эххх, а я так надеялась.
Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup.
from id
