با برگشتن به سوی تو خودم را نرمِ نرمِ نرم کرده ام و با زاری پیش تو خودم را کوچک کرده ام حالا اگر تو هم دست به سرم کنی باید به که رو بیاندازم ؟! اگر تو از پیش خودت ردم کنی دیگر به کجا پناه برم ؟! آه از این شرمندگی وایی از این رسوایی و افسوس از این بدکاری و گناه کاری که من دارم!
با برگشتن به سوی تو خودم را نرمِ نرمِ نرم کرده ام و با زاری پیش تو خودم را کوچک کرده ام حالا اگر تو هم دست به سرم کنی باید به که رو بیاندازم ؟! اگر تو از پیش خودت ردم کنی دیگر به کجا پناه برم ؟! آه از این شرمندگی وایی از این رسوایی و افسوس از این بدکاری و گناه کاری که من دارم!
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from in
