#СвердловскаяОбласть требует снять все обвинения с народного лидера Светланы Михайловны Лады-Русь и с честных, смелых активистов, которые говорят правду и борятся за свободу мысли и слова. Мы, народ, должны таких передовиков поддерживать!
✍ Требование о недоверии действующей системе власти, так как она, на мой взгляд, колонизаторская и служит международному капиталу https://forms.gle/KTRSJDbUzCgLFfhi9
Давайте найдем друг друга в своем регионе. Оставляйте здесь ваш контакт https://goo.su/OMU1l
#СвердловскаяОбласть требует снять все обвинения с народного лидера Светланы Михайловны Лады-Русь и с честных, смелых активистов, которые говорят правду и борятся за свободу мысли и слова. Мы, народ, должны таких передовиков поддерживать!
✍ Требование о недоверии действующей системе власти, так как она, на мой взгляд, колонизаторская и служит международному капиталу https://forms.gle/KTRSJDbUzCgLFfhi9
Давайте найдем друг друга в своем регионе. Оставляйте здесь ваш контакт https://goo.su/OMU1l
BY НАРОДНАЯ ТРИБУНА
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In February 2014, the Ukrainian people ousted pro-Russian president Viktor Yanukovych, prompting Russia to invade and annex the Crimean peninsula. By the start of April, Pavel Durov had given his notice, with TechCrunch saying at the time that the CEO had resisted pressure to suppress pages criticizing the Russian government. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from in
