La antifascista Maja T. fue trasladada hoy a un hospital penitenciario húngaro, según la campaña de solidaridad "Libertad para Maja".
Esta persona no binaria lleva 27 días en huelga de hambre para protestar por las pésimas condiciones penitenciarias en Hungría.
Su salud se ha deteriorado tanto que T. ya ha perdido 12 kg. Actualmente, T. solo consume agua y 250 ml de zumo al día.
A pesar del empeoramiento de su salud, el gobierno alemán se niega a emprender acciones diplomáticas para que T. regrese a Alemania.
Hace casi un año, T. fue extraditada de Alemania a Hungría, vía Austria, en una operación encubierta ilegal. En aquel momento, ya se había presentado una moción urgente contra la medida ante el Tribunal Constitucional Federal.
Recientemente se rechazó su traslado a arresto domiciliario
La antifascista Maja T. fue trasladada hoy a un hospital penitenciario húngaro, según la campaña de solidaridad "Libertad para Maja".
Esta persona no binaria lleva 27 días en huelga de hambre para protestar por las pésimas condiciones penitenciarias en Hungría.
Su salud se ha deteriorado tanto que T. ya ha perdido 12 kg. Actualmente, T. solo consume agua y 250 ml de zumo al día.
A pesar del empeoramiento de su salud, el gobierno alemán se niega a emprender acciones diplomáticas para que T. regrese a Alemania.
Hace casi un año, T. fue extraditada de Alemania a Hungría, vía Austria, en una operación encubierta ilegal. En aquel momento, ya se había presentado una moción urgente contra la medida ante el Tribunal Constitucional Federal.
Recientemente se rechazó su traslado a arresto domiciliario
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from it
